Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1493 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.