Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 9.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Claude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index25.950.3
Released2024-03-072026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding11991534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
WeirdML9.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%—
CadEval12%—
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11741512
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
CritPt—26.6%
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math11881494
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
ProofBench—70%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert11481543
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
MMLU73.8%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision9501264
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English11781474
LMArena Chinese11551529
LMArena Russian12041480
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11731493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11901501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text11951492
LMArena Creative Writing11571468
LMArena Multi-Turn11901464
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper