Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 42.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1467 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1445 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1432 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1398 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.