Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1468 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1421 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1434 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2.5 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.