Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 26.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Kimi K2.7 Code share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.