Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.1 to 10.7.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
Claude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.043.6
Released2024-02-292026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked3018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding12231466
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts11971445
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math12131430
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert11731449
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision9841228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English12051404
LMArena Chinese11891465
LMArena French12291447
LMArena German12041399
LMArena Japanese11311317
LMArena Korean11281355
LMArena Russian12271412
LMArena Spanish12041434

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following11991428

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query12111442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text12181423
LMArena Creative Writing11861392
LMArena Multi-Turn12271445

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper