Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 9.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 118K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or MiMo-V2-Omni?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.