Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 30.8.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-6 Luna specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index29.353.3
Released—2026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1642

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Coding10341439
DeepSWE—66.6%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1581
SciCode—54.6%
ALE-Bench—1,577
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
APEX-Agents—44.3%
GDP.pdf—23%

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Hard Prompts10051411
ARC-AGI-2—59.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—68.7%
ARC-AGI-1—86.7%
CritPt—19.4%
Chess Puzzles—31%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—90.1%
LMCA—44.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.28

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Math10471416
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—78.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—56.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.9%
ProofBench—64%

Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Expert9701444
GPQA Diamond—90.5%
SimpleQA Verified—41.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Vision—1217
Blueprint-Bench 2—31.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Non-English9881386
LMArena Chinese10121433
LMArena German9441369
LMArena Korean8991360
LMArena Russian9901394
LMArena French—1420
LMArena Japanese—1369
LMArena Spanish—1393

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following9921409

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query10031409

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text10221391
LMArena Creative Writing9981363
LMArena Multi-Turn9591396

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and GPT-6 Luna share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper