Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 63.8 to 25.1.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemma 1.1 2b IT specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index53.629.3
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Coding14571034
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—
HumanEval+—17.7%
MBPP+—23.3%

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14441005
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Math14271047
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Expert1441970
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Non-English1420988
LMArena Chinese14681012
LMArena German1418944
LMArena Korean1384899
LMArena Russian1428990
LMArena French1439—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following1421992

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query14341003

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Text14321022
LMArena Creative Writing1403998
LMArena Multi-Turn1449959
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper