Model comparison
DBRX vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 24.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 90.5% for GPT-6 Luna.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 53.3 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1439 |
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1581 |
| SciCode | — | 54.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,577 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DBRX: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 44.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1411 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 59.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 86.7% |
| CritPt | — | 19.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 31% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 44.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.28 |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1416 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 78.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 56.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 64% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 90.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1444 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1217 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 31.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |
Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1433 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1420 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1369 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1394 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1393 |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1409 |
Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1391 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1363 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1396 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and GPT-6 Luna share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.