Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 25.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 46.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1413 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1406 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Grok 4.7 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.