Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 42.7% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 42.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 46.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |
Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.