Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 34.3.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1130 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1127 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1173 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1109 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.