Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Wizardlm 70b
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 56.3.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Wizardlm 70b?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.