Model comparison
Molmo 2 8b vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 4 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 45.6.
Side by side
| Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1287 | 1220 |
Math Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1081 | — |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1276 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Molmo 2 8b better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.