Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 88.4% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 47.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 147.67 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1449 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1450 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1456 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1425 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1440 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.