Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.6 leads 40.5 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.8% for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 47.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 151.05 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1470 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 90.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1491 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1283 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1521 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1451 |
Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1468 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1453 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?
Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2.6 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.