Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 22.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.