Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 49.4.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Molmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.147.5
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked537

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
LMArena Coding—1467
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12871449
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.65

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1450
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1454

Multimodal Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Vision1081—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English12761424
LMArena Chinese—1477
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12701425

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text12881437
LMArena Creative Writing—1404
LMArena Multi-Turn—1438

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper