Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen Max
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Max in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 66.7% for Qwen Max.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 21.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1269 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 67.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |
Long Context Qwen Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1288 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen Max?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen Max better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen Max share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.