Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 60.1.
- C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 34.9 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.8 (#252), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1160 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 22.4 (#197), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1156 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.3 (#203), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1168 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.6 (#201), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1153 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#242), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1181 | — |
| LMArena German | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1197 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 60.1 (#253), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1155 | — |
Long Context C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#236), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 39.0 (#250), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1168 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.