Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 56.9% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | 63.5% |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | 60.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | 59% | 65.1% |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | — |
| DTBench | 67.8% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | — |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.