Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 121.23 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 17.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 27.6% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.