Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 18.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Math: 71% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 13.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 10.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 22.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 13.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 11.2% |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.