Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1304 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1287 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.