Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 2B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 2B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1010 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 20.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 34.1% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 94.2 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 989 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 35.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 71.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 77.3% |
| WinoGrande | — | 65.4% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1009 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 17.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemma 2B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 42.1% |
| BoolQ | — | 69.4% |
| MMLU | — | 42.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 53.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 958 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 986 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 937 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 970 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 981 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1002 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 987 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 945 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 2B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 2B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 2B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2B has 23.