Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Hy3 leads 44.1 to 29.2.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 44.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0825 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1464 |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1447 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1493 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1426 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1436 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Hy3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.