Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen3 32B
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 52.9.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy3: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Too close to call
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1305 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen3 32B?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3 32B?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is Hy3 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3 32B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.