Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in long context, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 44.0 to 29.2.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Gemini 2.0 Pro specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
ProviderAmazonGoogle
Noometry Index44.539.1
Released—2025-02-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
Aider Polyglot—35.6%
LiveBench Coding—63.5%
LMArena Coding1483—

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
EnigmaEval—0.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—60.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1458—
LiveBench Data Analysis—68%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.06
LiveBench—65.1%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Math—71%
LMArena Math1438—
MATH Level 5—83.5%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Confabulations—18.4%
LMArena Expert1506—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English1434—
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena Russian1423—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Instruction Following—83.4%
LMArena Instruction Following1427—

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
Fiction.LiveBench—41.7%
LMArena Longer Query1441—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Gemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Text1448—
LMArena Creative Writing1368—
LMArena Multi-Turn1442—
LiveBench Language—44.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper