Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Inkling
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Inkling in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 88.3% for Inkling.
- Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 44.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 66K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.87 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.68 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1464 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |
Reasoning Inkling leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 148.54 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1451 |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1479 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Inkling leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1490 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1426 |
Long Context Inkling leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1434 |
Writing & Preference Inkling leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1436 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Inkling?
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Inkling better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Inkling share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.