Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

GPT-4 OpenAI

28.9

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-4 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 10.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 23% for GPT-4.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index38.628.9
Released2025-02-052023-03-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$30
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1438

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), GPT-4: 31.2 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
WeirdML—12.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1254
BigCodeBench Complete—57.2%
HumanEval+—79.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
METR Time Horizons—36.1%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), GPT-4: 17.3 (#285)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06125.88
Chess Puzzles—4%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1241
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—62.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—17.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—75.1%
ForecastBench—57.8
HellaSwag—95.3%
LiveBench65.1%—
WinoGrande—87.5%

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), GPT-4: 10.1 (#304)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
MATH Level 583.5%23%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.1%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1269
GSM8K—92%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), GPT-4: 18.4 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
GPQA Diamond65.7%35.7%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1211
MMLU—86.4%
TriviaQA—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4: 40.8 (#210)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Non-English—1246
LMArena Chinese—1242
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1251
LMArena Japanese—1209
LMArena Korean—1184
LMArena Russian—1251
LMArena Spanish—1261

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), GPT-4: 65.5 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1241

Long Context GPT-4 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), GPT-4: 37.7 (#207)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1244

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), GPT-4: 35.0 (#263)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Text—1263
LMArena Creative Writing—1244
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—752
LMArena Multi-Turn—1257
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper