Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

28.9

Rank #309 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 13.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 46.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index28.938.6
Released2024-10-222025-02-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
Aider Polyglot28%35.6%
LiveBench Coding51.4%63.5%
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LMArena Coding1287—
BigCodeBench Complete59%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%60.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%68%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15135.06
LiveBench43.5%65.1%
CritPt0%—
EnigmaEval—0.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench56.7%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Math35.5%71%
MATH Level 546.4%83.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
LMArena Math1244—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond38.1%65.7%
Confabulations36.7%18.4%
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—
LMArena Expert1208—
MMLU74.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English1238—
LMArena Chinese1229—
LMArena French1262—
LMArena German1237—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1172—
LMArena Russian1253—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%83.4%
IFEval79.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
Fiction.LiveBench—41.7%
LMArena Longer Query1261—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Language35.4%44.9%
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1233—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1265—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper