Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs Llama 4 Scout

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 37.0.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1 and Llama 4 Scout specifications
ERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
ProviderBaiduMeta
Noometry Index43.827.7
Released—2025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1943

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding14881286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts14811266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Math14811287
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Expert14921235
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English14541252
LMArena Chinese15081255
LMArena French14881282
LMArena German14701272
LMArena Japanese14221206
LMArena Korean14271207
LMArena Russian14591263
LMArena Spanish14731278

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following14601248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query14621265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text14681279
LMArena Creative Writing14411249
LMArena Multi-Turn14711280
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Llama 4 Scout?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Llama 4 Scout share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper