Model comparison
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Llama 4 Scout
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 62.8 to 37.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 75% for Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and 36.9% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 27.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.0 (#122), Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 32.8 (#64), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | 36.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | 1266 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.64 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
Math Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 35.8 (#134), Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1286 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.7 (#131), Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1400 | 1236 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 51.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Confabulations | 16.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
Multimodal Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.9 (#54), Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1243 | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 53.1 (#72), Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1419 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1256 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1424 | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1406 | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | 1397 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1435 | 1277 |
Instruction Following Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.2 (#102), Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1248 |
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |
Long Context Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#104), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |
Writing & Preference Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.8 (#68), Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1429 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1249 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1501 | 783 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | 1281 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Llama 4 Scout?
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Llama 4 Scout share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.