Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Yi-34B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 41.9 to 7.5.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1112 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Yi-34B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1104 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1070 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1091 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Yi-34B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Yi-34B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Yi-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.