Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Llama 3.2 90B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Llama 3.2 90B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.