Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 49.4.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1299 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1298 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1275 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.