Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.5

Rank #174 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.4 to 31.0.
  • Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.238.5
Released—2025-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2032

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.0 (#188)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding14551416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.5 (#75)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 21.6 (#193)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts14461398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 36.0 (#133)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math14371394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.7 (#96)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Expert14271395
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Qwen3-30B-A3B: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.8 (#126)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English14361372
LMArena Chinese15121434
LMArena French14661419
LMArena German14621379
LMArena Japanese13831338
LMArena Korean14061333
LMArena Russian14461369
LMArena Spanish14731403

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.2 (#137)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following14131364

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#278)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query14221379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.9 (#138)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text14451384
LMArena Creative Writing14261318
LMArena Multi-Turn14331378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper