Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.4

Rank #176 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 28.4 to 16.3.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.6 Flash specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.238.4
Released—2026-04-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.19
Output $ / M tokens—$1.13
Results tracked2013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Coding1455—
ALE-Bench—326.4

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
SimpleBench—35.2%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Chess Puzzles—20%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1446—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.26

Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—22.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
LMArena Math1437—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—10.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
LMArena Expert1427—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1512—
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1462—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1445—
LMArena Creative Writing1426—
LMArena Multi-Turn1433—

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper