Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 47.4.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-4.7-Flash specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.838.8
Released—2026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2021

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding14551383

Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14451356
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Math14371355
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—58.3%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Expert14281357
GPQA Diamond—60.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GLM-4.7-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14361330
LMArena Chinese15121403
LMArena French14671332
LMArena German14601337
LMArena Korean14061283
LMArena Russian14461332
LMArena Spanish14731350
LMArena Japanese1382—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14131327

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14221345

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14451351
LMArena Creative Writing14261297
LMArena Multi-Turn14341342
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1125

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper