Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 47.3 to 41.9.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1314 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1289 |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1275 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.