Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 1 category and Wizardlm 70b in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 32.2 to 8.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1081 |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1079 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1093 |
Long Context Too close to call
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.9 vs 31.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Wizardlm 70b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.