Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 9.6.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.