Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 8.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1112 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1113 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1135 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1118 |
Long Context Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.9 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.