Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 33.1 to 8.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1149 |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1138 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1159 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1131 |
Multilingual Too close to call
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1063 |
Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1116 |
Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1099 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.