Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 33.4 to 8.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index24.933.0
Released2023-11-29—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding10961130

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10701127
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11081173
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1108

Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10731094
LMArena Chinese11321108
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Russian—1145
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10791113

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10921120

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text11051138
LMArena Creative Writing10671107
LMArena Multi-Turn10821088

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper