Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.9 to 8.7.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1130 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1127 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1173 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1109 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.