Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 33.4 to 10.2.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1130 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1127 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1173 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1113 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.