Model comparison
DBRX vs Seed 2.0 Pro
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
ByteDance SeedSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-02-14 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1472 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1453 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1439 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1274 |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1489 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1442 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1411 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1460 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1414 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1428 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1441 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Seed 2.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Seed 2.0 Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.