Model comparison
DBRX vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 33.6.
Side by side
| DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1439 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1428 |
Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1426 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1442 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1408 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1428 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1406 |
Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1420 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1428 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.